Homeβ€Ί Knowledge Baseβ€Ί Mathematical Modeling of Plasma Etching in Semiconductor Manufacturing

Mathematical Modeling of Plasma Etching in Semiconductor Manufacturing

Introduction

Plasma etching is a critical process in semiconductor manufacturing where reactive gases are ionized to create a plasma, which selectively removes material from a wafer surface. The mathematical modeling of this process spans multiple physics domains:

Foundational Plasma Physics

Boltzmann Transport Equation

The most fundamental description of plasma behavior is the Boltzmann transport equation, governing the evolution of the particle velocity distribution function $f(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{v}, t)$:

$$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \mathbf{v} \cdot abla f + \frac{\mathbf{F}}{m} \cdot abla_v f = \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)_{\text{collision}} $$

Where:

Fluid Moment Equations

For computational tractability, velocity moments of the Boltzmann equation yield fluid equations:

Continuity Equation (Mass Conservation)

$$ \frac{\partial n}{\partial t} + abla \cdot (n\mathbf{u}) = S - L $$

Where:

Momentum Conservation

$$ \frac{\partial (nm\mathbf{u})}{\partial t} + abla \cdot (nm\mathbf{u}\mathbf{u}) + abla p = nq(\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B}) - nm u_m \mathbf{u} $$

Where:

u_m$ β€” Momentum transfer collision frequency $[\text{s}^{-1}]$

Energy Conservation

$$ \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\frac{3}{2}nk_BT\right) + abla \cdot \mathbf{q} + p abla \cdot \mathbf{u} = Q_{\text{heating}} - Q_{\text{loss}} $$

Where:

Electromagnetic Field Coupling

Maxwell's Equations

For capacitively coupled plasma (CCP) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) reactors:

$$

abla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} $$

$$

abla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t} $$

$$

abla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho $$

$$

abla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0 $$

Plasma Conductivity

The plasma current density couples through the complex conductivity:

$$ \mathbf{J} = \sigma \mathbf{E} $$

For RF plasmas, the complex conductivity is:

$$ \sigma = \frac{n_e e^2}{m_e( u_m + i\omega)} $$

Where:

u_m$ β€” Electron-neutral collision frequency

Power Deposition

Time-averaged power density deposited into the plasma:

$$ P = \frac{1}{2}\text{Re}(\mathbf{J} \cdot \mathbf{E}^*) $$

Typical values:

Plasma Sheath Physics

The sheath is a thin, non-neutral region at the plasma-wafer interface that accelerates ions toward the surface, enabling anisotropic etching.

Bohm Criterion

Minimum ion velocity entering the sheath:

$$ u_i \geq u_B = \sqrt{\frac{k_B T_e}{M_i}} $$

Where:

Example: For Ar⁺ ions with $T_e = 3$ eV: $$ u_B = \sqrt{\frac{3 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19}}{40 \times 1.67 \times 10^{-27}}} \approx 2.7 \text{ km/s} $$

Child-Langmuir Law

For a collisionless sheath, the ion current density is:

$$ J = \frac{4\varepsilon_0}{9}\sqrt{\frac{2e}{M_i}} \cdot \frac{V_s^{3/2}}{d^2} $$

Where:

Sheath Thickness

The sheath thickness scales as:

$$ d \approx \lambda_D \left(\frac{2eV_s}{k_BT_e}\right)^{3/4} $$

Where the Debye length is:

$$ \lambda_D = \sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_0 k_B T_e}{n_e e^2}} $$

Ion Angular Distribution

Ions arrive at the wafer with an angular distribution:

$$ f(\theta) \propto \exp\left(-\frac{\theta^2}{2\sigma^2}\right) $$

Where:

$$ \sigma \approx \arctan\left(\sqrt{\frac{k_B T_i}{eV_s}}\right) $$

Typical values: $\sigma \approx 2°–5Β°$ for high-bias conditions.

Electron Energy Distribution Function

Non-Maxwellian Distributions

In low-pressure plasmas (1–100 mTorr), the EEDF deviates from Maxwellian.

Two-Term Approximation

The EEDF is expanded as:

$$ f(\varepsilon, \theta) = f_0(\varepsilon) + f_1(\varepsilon)\cos\theta $$

The isotropic part $f_0$ satisfies:

$$ \frac{d}{d\varepsilon}\left[\varepsilon D \frac{df_0}{d\varepsilon} + \left(V + \frac{\varepsilon u_{\text{inel}}}{ u_m}\right)f_0\right] = 0 $$

Common Distribution Functions

DistributionFunctional FormApplicability
Maxwellian$f(\varepsilon) \propto \sqrt{\varepsilon} \exp\left(-\frac{\varepsilon}{k_BT_e}\right)$High pressure, collisional
Druyvesteyn$f(\varepsilon) \propto \sqrt{\varepsilon} \exp\left(-\left(\frac{\varepsilon}{k_BT_e}\right)^2\right)$Elastic collisions dominant
Bi-MaxwellianSum of two MaxwelliansHot tail population

Generalized Form

$$ f(\varepsilon) \propto \sqrt{\varepsilon} \cdot \exp\left[-\left(\frac{\varepsilon}{k_BT_e}\right)^x\right] $$

Plasma Chemistry and Reaction Kinetics

Species Balance Equation

For species $i$:

$$ \frac{\partial n_i}{\partial t} + abla \cdot \mathbf{\Gamma}_i = \sum_j R_j $$

Where:

Electron-Impact Rate Coefficients

Rate coefficients are calculated by integration over the EEDF:

$$ k = \int_0^\infty \sigma(\varepsilon) v(\varepsilon) f(\varepsilon) \, d\varepsilon = \langle \sigma v \rangle $$

Where:

Heavy-Particle Reactions

Arrhenius kinetics for neutral reactions:

$$ k = A T^n \exp\left(-\frac{E_a}{k_BT}\right) $$

Where:

Example: SF₆/Oβ‚‚ Plasma Chemistry

Electron-Impact Reactions

ReactionTypeThreshold
$e + \text{SF}_6 \rightarrow \text{SF}_5 + \text{F} + e$Dissociation~10 eV
$e + \text{SF}_6 \rightarrow \text{SF}_6^-$Attachment~0 eV
$e + \text{SF}_6 \rightarrow \text{SF}_5^+ + \text{F} + 2e$Ionization~16 eV
$e + \text{O}_2 \rightarrow \text{O} + \text{O} + e$Dissociation~6 eV

Gas-Phase Reactions

Surface Reactions

Transport Phenomena

Drift-Diffusion Model

For charged species, the flux is:

$$ \mathbf{\Gamma} = \pm \mu n \mathbf{E} - D abla n $$

Where:

Einstein Relation

Connects mobility and diffusion:

$$ D = \frac{\mu k_B T}{e} $$

Ambipolar Diffusion

When quasi-neutrality holds ($n_e \approx n_i$):

$$ D_a = \frac{\mu_i D_e + \mu_e D_i}{\mu_i + \mu_e} \approx D_i\left(1 + \frac{T_e}{T_i}\right) $$

Since $T_e \gg T_i$ typically: $D_a \approx D_i (1 + T_e/T_i) \approx 100 D_i$

Neutral Transport

For reactive neutrals (radicals), Fickian diffusion:

$$ \frac{\partial n}{\partial t} = D abla^2 n + S - L $$

Surface Boundary Condition

$$ -D\frac{\partial n}{\partial x}\bigg|_{\text{surface}} = \frac{1}{4}\gamma n v_{\text{th}} $$

Where:

Knudsen Number

Determines the appropriate transport regime:

$$ \text{Kn} = \frac{\lambda}{L} $$

Where:

Kn RangeRegimeModel
$< 0.01$ContinuumNavier-Stokes
$0.01–0.1$Slip flowModified N-S
$0.1–10$TransitionDSMC/BGK
$> 10$Free molecularBallistic

Surface Reaction Modeling

Langmuir Adsorption Kinetics

For surface coverage $\theta$:

$$ \frac{d\theta}{dt} = k_{\text{ads}}(1-\theta)P - k_{\text{des}}\theta - k_{\text{react}}\theta $$

At steady state:

$$ \theta = \frac{k_{\text{ads}}P}{k_{\text{ads}}P + k_{\text{des}} + k_{\text{react}}} $$

Ion-Enhanced Etching

The total etch rate combines multiple mechanisms:

$$ \text{ER} = Y_{\text{chem}} \Gamma_n + Y_{\text{phys}} \Gamma_i + Y_{\text{syn}} \Gamma_i f(\theta) $$

Where:

Ion Sputtering Yield

Energy Dependence

$$ Y(E) = A\left(\sqrt{E} - \sqrt{E_{\text{th}}}\right) \quad \text{for } E > E_{\text{th}} $$

Typical threshold energies:

Angular Dependence

$$ Y(\theta) = Y(0) \cos^{-f}(\theta) \exp\left[-b\left(\frac{1}{\cos\theta} - 1\right)\right] $$

Behavior:

Feature-Scale Profile Evolution

Level Set Method

The surface is represented as the zero contour of $\phi(\mathbf{x}, t)$:

$$ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + V_n | abla \phi| = 0 $$

Where:

Local Etch Rate Calculation

The normal velocity $V_n$ depends on:

1. Ion flux and angular distribution $$\Gamma_i(\mathbf{x}) = \int f(\theta, E) \, d\Omega \, dE$$

2. Neutral flux (with shadowing) $$\Gamma_n(\mathbf{x}) = \Gamma_{n,0} \cdot \text{VF}(\mathbf{x})$$ where VF is the view factor

3. Surface chemistry state $$V_n = f(\Gamma_i, \Gamma_n, \theta_{\text{coverage}}, T)$$

Neutral Transport in High-Aspect-Ratio Features

Clausing Transmission Factor

For a tube of aspect ratio AR:

$$ K \approx \frac{1}{1 + 0.5 \cdot \text{AR}} $$

View Factor Calculations

For surface element $dA_1$ seeing $dA_2$:

$$ F_{1 \rightarrow 2} = \frac{1}{\pi} \int \frac{\cos\theta_1 \cos\theta_2}{r^2} \, dA_2 $$

Monte Carlo Methods

Test-Particle Monte Carlo Algorithm

1. SAMPLE incident particle from flux distribution at feature opening
   - Ion: from IEDF and IADF
   - Neutral: from Maxwellian
   
2. TRACE trajectory through feature
   - Ion: ballistic, solve equation of motion
   - Neutral: random walk with wall collisions
   
3. DETERMINE reaction at surface impact
   - Sample from probability distribution
   - Update surface coverage if adsorption
   
4. UPDATE surface geometry
   - Remove material (etching)
   - Add material (deposition)
   
5. REPEAT for statistically significant sample

Ion Trajectory Integration

Through the sheath/feature:

$$ m\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{dt^2} = q\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}) $$

Numerical integration: Velocity-Verlet or Boris algorithm

Collision Sampling

Null-collision method for efficiency:

$$ P_{\text{collision}} = 1 - \exp(- u_{\text{max}} \Delta t) $$

Where $ u_{\text{max}}$ is the maximum possible collision frequency.

Multi-Scale Modeling Framework

Scale Hierarchy

ScaleLengthTimePhysicsMethod
Reactorcm–mms–sPlasma transport, EM fieldsFluid PDE
SheathΒ΅m–mmΒ΅s–msIon acceleration, EEDFKinetic/Fluid
Featurenm–¡mns–msProfile evolutionLevel set/MC
AtomicÅ–nmps–nsReaction mechanismsMD/DFT

Coupling Approaches

Hierarchical (One-Way)

Atomic scale β†’ Surface parameters
     ↓
Feature scale ← Fluxes from reactor scale
     ↓
Reactor scale β†’ Process outputs

Concurrent (Two-Way)

Numerical Methods and Challenges

Stiff ODE Systems

Plasma chemistry involves timescales spanning many orders of magnitude:

ProcessTimescale
Electron attachment$\sim 10^{-10}$ s
Ion-molecule reactions$\sim 10^{-6}$ s
Metastable decay$\sim 10^{-3}$ s
Surface diffusion$\sim 10^{-1}$ s

Implicit Methods Required

Backward Differentiation Formula (BDF):

$$ y_{n+1} = \sum_{j=0}^{k-1} \alpha_j y_{n-j} + h\beta f(t_{n+1}, y_{n+1}) $$

Spatial Discretization

Finite Volume Method

Ensures mass conservation:

$$ \int_V \frac{\partial n}{\partial t} dV + \oint_S \mathbf{\Gamma} \cdot d\mathbf{S} = \int_V S \, dV $$

Mesh Requirements

EM-Plasma Coupling

Iterative scheme:

1. Solve Maxwell's equations for $\mathbf{E}$, $\mathbf{B}$ 2. Update plasma transport (density, temperature) 3. Recalculate $\sigma$, $\varepsilon_{\text{plasma}}$ 4. Repeat until convergence

Advanced Topics

Atomic Layer Etching (ALE)

Self-limiting reactions for atomic precision:

$$ \text{EPC} = \Theta \cdot d_{\text{ML}} $$

Where:

ALE Cycle

1. Modification step: Reactive gas creates modified surface layer $$\frac{d\Theta}{dt} = k_{\text{mod}}(1-\Theta)P_{\text{gas}}$$

2. Removal step: Ion bombardment removes modified layer only $$\text{ER} = Y_{\text{mod}}\Gamma_i\Theta$$

Pulsed Plasma Dynamics

Time-modulated RF introduces:

Ion Energy Modulation

By pulsing bias:

$$ \langle E_i \rangle = \frac{1}{T}\left[\int_0^{t_{\text{on}}} E_{\text{high}}dt + \int_{t_{\text{on}}}^{T} E_{\text{low}}dt\right] $$

High-Aspect-Ratio Etching (HAR)

For AR > 50 (memory, 3D NAND):

Challenges:

Ion Angular Distribution Broadening:

$$ \sigma_{\text{effective}} = \sqrt{\sigma_{\text{sheath}}^2 + \sigma_{\text{scattering}}^2} $$

Neutral Flux at Bottom:

$$ \Gamma_{\text{bottom}} \approx \Gamma_{\text{top}} \cdot K(\text{AR}) $$

Machine Learning Integration

Applications:

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs):

$$ \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{data}} + \lambda \mathcal{L}_{\text{physics}} $$

Where $\mathcal{L}_{\text{physics}}$ enforces governing equations.

Validation and Experimental Techniques

Plasma Diagnostics

TechniqueMeasurementTypical Values
Langmuir probe$n_e$, $T_e$, EEDF$10^{9}–10^{12}$ cm⁻³, 1–5 eV
OESRelative species densitiesQualitative/semi-quantitative
APMSIon mass, energy1–500 amu, 0–500 eV
LIFAbsolute radical density$10^{11}–10^{14}$ cm⁻³
Microwave interferometry$n_e$ (line-averaged)$10^{10}–10^{12}$ cm⁻³

Etch Characterization

Model Validation Workflow

1. Plasma validation: Match $n_e$, $T_e$, species densities 2. Flux validation: Compare ion/neutral fluxes to wafer 3. Etch rate validation: Blanket wafer etch rates 4. Profile validation: Patterned feature cross-sections

Key Dimensionless Numbers Summary

NumberDefinitionPhysical Meaning
Knudsen$\text{Kn} = \lambda/L$Continuum vs. kinetic
DamkΓΆhler$\text{Da} = \tau_{\text{transport}}/\tau_{\text{reaction}}$Transport vs. reaction limited
Sticking coefficient$\gamma = \text{reactions}/\text{collisions}$Surface reactivity
Aspect ratio$\text{AR} = \text{depth}/\text{width}$Feature geometry
Debye number$N_D = n\lambda_D^3$Plasma ideality

Physical Constants

ConstantSymbolValue
Elementary charge$e$$1.602 \times 10^{-19}$ C
Electron mass$m_e$$9.109 \times 10^{-31}$ kg
Proton mass$m_p$$1.673 \times 10^{-27}$ kg
Boltzmann constant$k_B$$1.381 \times 10^{-23}$ J/K
Vacuum permittivity$\varepsilon_0$$8.854 \times 10^{-12}$ F/m
Vacuum permeability$\mu_0$$4\pi \times 10^{-7}$ H/m
plasma physics and etchingplasma etchingdry etchingriereactive ion etchingplasma chemistryetch rateselectivityanisotropic etchingplasma modeling

Explore 500+ Semiconductor & AI Topics

From EUV lithography to CUDA optimization β€” search the full knowledge base or chat with our AI assistant.