Semiconductor Manufacturing: Ion Implantation Mathematical Modeling
Keywords: implant modeling, ion implantation, doping, dopant diffusion, range straggling, damage
Semiconductor Manufacturing: Ion Implantation Mathematical Modeling
1. Introduction
Ion implantation is a critical process in semiconductor fabrication where dopant ions (B, P, As, Sb) are accelerated and embedded into silicon substrates to precisely control electrical properties.
Key Process Parameters:
- Energy (keV): Controls implant depth ($R_p$)
- Dose (ions/cm²): Controls peak concentration
- Tilt angle (°): Minimizes channeling effects
- Twist angle (°): Avoids major crystal planes
- Beam current (mA): Affects dose rate and wafer heating
2. Foundational Physics: Ion Stopping
When an energetic ion enters a solid, it loses energy through two primary mechanisms.
2.1 Total Stopping Power
Where:
- $N$ = atomic density of target ($\approx 5 \times 10^{22}$ atoms/cm³ for Si)
- $S_n(E)$ = nuclear stopping cross-section (elastic collisions with nuclei)
- $S_e(E)$ = electronic stopping cross-section (inelastic energy loss to electrons)
2.2 Nuclear Stopping: ZBL Universal Potential
The Ziegler-Biersack-Littmark (ZBL) universal screening function:
Where $x = r/a_u$ is the reduced interatomic distance.
Universal screening length:
Where:
- $a_0$ = Bohr radius (0.529 Å)
- $Z_1$ = atomic number of incident ion
- $Z_2$ = atomic number of target atom
2.3 Electronic Stopping
Low energy regime (velocity-proportional, Lindhard-Scharff):
Where:
High energy regime (Bethe-Bloch formula):
Where:
- $m_e$ = electron mass
- $v$ = ion velocity
- $I$ = mean ionization potential of target
3. Range Statistics and Profile Models
3.1 Gaussian Approximation (First Order)
For amorphous targets, the as-implanted profile:
| Symbol | Definition | Units |
|---|---|---|
| $\Phi$ | Implant dose | ions/cm² |
| $R_p$ | Projected range (mean depth) | nm or cm |
| $\Delta R_p$ | Range straggle (standard deviation) | nm or cm |
Peak concentration:
3.2 Pearson IV Distribution (Industry Standard)
Real profiles exhibit asymmetry. The Pearson IV distribution uses four statistical moments:
Four Moments:
1. First Moment (Mean): $R_p$ — projected range 2. Second Moment (Variance): $\Delta R_p^2$ — spread 3. Third Moment (Skewness): $\gamma$ — asymmetry
- $\gamma < 0$: tail extends deeper into substrate (light ions: B)
- $\gamma > 0$: tail extends toward surface (heavy ions: As)
4. Fourth Moment (Kurtosis): $\beta$ — peakedness relative to Gaussian
Typical values for Si:
| Dopant | Skewness ($\gamma$) | Kurtosis ($\beta$) |
|---|---|---|
| Boron (B) | -0.5 to +0.5 | 2.5 to 4.0 |
| Phosphorus (P) | -0.3 to +0.3 | 2.5 to 3.5 |
| Arsenic (As) | +0.5 to +1.5 | 3.0 to 5.0 |
| Antimony (Sb) | +0.8 to +2.0 | 3.5 to 6.0 |
3.3 Dual Pearson Model (Channeling Effects)
For implants into crystalline silicon with channeling tails:
Where:
- $P_{random}(x)$ = Pearson distribution for random (amorphous) stopping
- $P_{channel}(x)$ = Pearson distribution for channeled ions
- $f_{ch}$ = channeling fraction (depends on tilt, beam divergence, surface oxide)
Channeling fraction dependencies:
- Beam divergence: $f_{ch} \downarrow$ as divergence $\uparrow$
- Tilt angle: $f_{ch} \downarrow$ as tilt $\uparrow$ (typically 7° off-axis)
- Surface oxide: $f_{ch} \downarrow$ with screen oxide
- Pre-amorphization: $f_{ch} \approx 0$ with PAI
4. Monte Carlo Simulation (BCA Method)
The Binary Collision Approximation provides the highest accuracy for profile prediction.
4.1 Algorithm Overview
FOR each ion i = 1 to N_ions (typically 10⁵ - 10⁶):
1. Initialize:
- Energy: E = E₀
- Position: (x, y, z) = (0, 0, 0)
- Direction: (cos θ, sin θ cos φ, sin θ sin φ)
2. WHILE E > E_cutoff:
a. Calculate mean free path:
$\lambda = 1 / (N \cdot \pi \cdot p_{max}^2)$
b. Select random impact parameter:
$p = p_{max} \cdot \sqrt{\text{random}[0,1]}$
c. Solve scattering integral for deflection angle $\Theta$
d. Calculate energy transfer to target atom:
$T = T_{max} \cdot \sin^2(\Theta/2)$
e. Update ion energy:
$E \to E - T - \Delta E_{\text{electronic}}$
f. IF T > E_displacement:
Create recoil cascade (track secondary)
g. Update position and direction vectors
3. Record final ion position (x_final, y_final, z_final)
END FOR
4. Build histogram of final positions → Dopant profile
4.2 Scattering Integral
The classical scattering integral for deflection angle:
Where:
- $p$ = impact parameter
- $r_{min}$ = distance of closest approach
- $V(r)$ = interatomic potential (e.g., ZBL)
- $E_c$ = center-of-mass energy
Center-of-mass energy:
4.3 Energy Transfer
Maximum energy transfer in elastic collision:
Where $\gamma$ is the kinematic factor:
| Ion → Si | $M_1$ (amu) | $\gamma$ |
|---|---|---|
| B → Si | 11 | 0.702 |
| P → Si | 31 | 0.968 |
| As → Si | 75 | 0.746 |
4.4 Electronic Energy Loss (Continuous)
Along the free flight path:
5. Multi-Layer and Through-Film Implantation
5.1 Screen Oxide Implantation
For implantation through oxide layer of thickness $t_{ox}$:
Range correction:
Straggle correction:
5.2 Moment Matching at Interfaces
For multi-layer structures, use moment conservation:
Where $w_i$ is the weighting factor for layer $i$.
6. Two-Dimensional Profile Modeling
6.1 Lateral Straggle
The lateral distribution follows:
Relationship between straggles:
6.2 Masked Implant with Edge Effects
For a mask opening of width $W$:
6.3 Full 3D Distribution
7. Damage and Defect Modeling
7.1 Kinchin-Pease Model
Number of displaced atoms per incident ion:
Where:
- $E_D$ = damage energy (energy deposited into nuclear collisions)
- $E_d$ = displacement threshold energy ($\approx 15$ eV for Si)
7.2 Modified NRT Model (Norgett-Robinson-Torrens)
The factor 0.8 accounts for forward scattering efficiency.
7.3 Damage Energy Partition
Lindhard partition function:
Where:
7.4 Amorphization Threshold
Critical dose for amorphization:
Typical values:
| Ion | Critical Dose (cm⁻²) |
|---|---|
| B⁺ | $\sim 10^{15}$ |
| P⁺ | $\sim 5 \times 10^{14}$ |
| As⁺ | $\sim 10^{14}$ |
| Sb⁺ | $\sim 5 \times 10^{13}$ |
7.5 Damage Profile
The damage distribution differs from dopant distribution:
Where $R_d < R_p$ (damage peaks shallower than dopant).
8. Process-Relevant Calculations
8.1 Junction Depth
For Gaussian profile meeting background concentration $C_B$:
For asymmetric Pearson profiles:
8.2 Sheet Resistance
With concentration-dependent mobility (Masetti model):
| Parameter | Electrons | Holes |
|---|---|---|
| $\mu_{min}$ | 52.2 | 44.9 |
| $\mu_0$ | 1417 | 470.5 |
| $C_r$ | $9.68 \times 10^{16}$ | $2.23 \times 10^{17}$ |
| $\alpha$ | 0.68 | 0.719 |
8.3 Threshold Voltage Shift
For channel implant:
Simplified (shallow implant):
8.4 Dose Calculation from Profile
Verification:
Where:
- $I$ = beam current
- $t$ = implant time
- $A$ = implanted area
9. Advanced Effects
9.1 Transient Enhanced Diffusion (TED)
The "+1 Model": Each implanted ion creates approximately one net interstitial.
Enhanced diffusion equation:
Enhanced diffusivity:
Where:
- $D_i$ = intrinsic diffusivity
- $C_I$ = interstitial concentration
- $C_I^*$ = equilibrium interstitial concentration
9.2 Dose Loss Mechanisms
Sputtering yield:
Where:
- $\alpha$ = angular factor ($\approx 0.2$ for light ions, $\approx 0.4$ for heavy ions)
- $U_0$ = surface binding energy ($\approx 4.7$ eV for Si)
Retained dose:
9.3 High Dose Effects
Dose saturation:
Snow-plow effect at very high doses pushes peak toward surface.
9.4 Temperature Effects
Dynamic annealing: Competes with damage accumulation
Where $E_a \approx 0.3$ eV for Si self-interstitial migration.
10. Summary Tables
10.1 Key Scaling Relationships
| Parameter | Scaling with Energy |
|---|---|
| Projected Range | $R_p \propto E^n$ where $n \approx 0.5 - 0.8$ |
| Range Straggle | $\Delta R_p \approx 0.4 R_p$ (light ions) to $0.2 R_p$ (heavy ions) |
| Lateral Straggle | $\Delta R_\perp \approx 0.7 - 1.0 \times \Delta R_p$ |
| Damage Energy | $E_D/E_0$ increases with ion mass |
10.2 Common Implant Parameters in Si
| Dopant | Type | Energy (keV) | $R_p$ (nm) | $\Delta R_p$ (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | p | 10 | 35 | 14 |
| B | p | 50 | 160 | 52 |
| P | n | 30 | 40 | 15 |
| P | n | 100 | 120 | 40 |
| As | n | 50 | 35 | 12 |
| As | n | 150 | 95 | 28 |
10.3 Simulation Tools Comparison
| Approach | Speed | Accuracy | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analytical (Gaussian) | ★★★★★ | ★★☆☆☆ | Quick estimates |
| Pearson IV Tables | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ | Process simulation |
| Monte Carlo (SRIM/TRIM) | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ | Profile calibration |
| Molecular Dynamics | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★★★ | Damage cascade studies |
Quick Reference Formulas
Essential Equations Card
-
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GAUSSIAN PROFILE │
│ $C(x) = \Phi/(\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot \Delta R_p) \cdot \exp[-(x-R_p)^2/(2\Delta R_p^2)]$ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PEAK CONCENTRATION │
│ $C_{max} \approx 0.4 \cdot \Phi/\Delta R_p$ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ JUNCTION DEPTH │
│ $x_j = R_p + \Delta R_p \cdot \sqrt{2 \cdot \ln(C_{max}/C_B)}$ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SHEET RESISTANCE │
│ $R_s = 1/(q \cdot \int \mu(C) \cdot C(x) dx)$ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ DISPLACEMENT DAMAGE │
│ $N_d = 0.8 \cdot E_D/(2E_d)$ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Source: ChipFoundryServices — Search this topic — Ask CFSGPT
Explore 500+ Semiconductor & AI Topics
From EUV lithography to CUDA optimization — search the full knowledge base or chat with our AI assistant.