Barc

Bottom and top antireflective coating modules (BARC and TARC) exist to stop light from bouncing around inside the resist stack during exposure. BARC sits underneath the photoresist and absorbs light that would otherwise reflect off the substrate back up into the resist; TARC sits on top and suppresses reflections at the resist-air interface. Both attack the same problem — standing waves and swing-curve CD variation — from opposite sides of the resist film.

Substrate reflectivity varies
Different films/topography reflect exposure light differently
Where reflections cause trouble
Substrate-resist interface
Light reflects back up through resist → BARC absorbs it here
Resist-air interface
Light reflects down at the top surface → TARC suppresses it here
Exposure dose reaches resist uniformly
CD stays constant regardless of underlying film thickness

Without BARC, the exact same exposure dose produces a different linewidth depending on what's directly underneath the resist. A reflective film like polysilicon or metal sends exposing light back up into the resist a second time, and the amount reflected depends sensitively on that film's thickness — so two identical resist exposures over slightly different underlying film thicknesses develop into slightly different linewidths. This swing-curve effect was one of the first things that forced BARC into mainstream use once CDs shrank below a few hundred nanometers.

BARC and TARC — Killing Reflections From Both Sides same swing-curve problem, attacked above and below the resist TARC — suppresses top reflection Photoresist BARC — absorbs reflected light here Substrate (reflective film) reflection stopped by BARC stopped by TARC without BARC: linewidth varies with underlying film thickness (swing curve) BARC is far more common in production than TARC, which is mainly used for very tight CD control

TARC sees far less use in practice because the top reflection it fights is usually the smaller contributor. Most of the swing-curve variation comes from the substrate side, where reflectivity differences between films (oxide, nitride, metal, poly) are large; the resist-to-air interface reflects a comparatively small, more consistent fraction of light. That asymmetry is why BARC is close to standard on critical layers while TARC is reserved for processes with unusually tight CD budgets where even the smaller top-surface contribution matters.

BARC and TARC modules are a direct response to a problem photoresist chemistry alone can't solve: a resist film can't tell the difference between light that arrived once and light that bounced back and forth inside the stack, so the fix has to come from absorbing or suppressing those bounces before they reach the resist at all.

Take BARC further

Ask the copilot about this term, or have our engineers assess it against your process.

Ask CFSGPT about this → Request a technical assessment → Open the CFS app