Causal Inference Treatment Effects Causal Discovery

# Causal Inference: Treatment Effects & Causal Discovery

## Introduction & Motivation

Causal Inference: identify causal relationships. Treatment effects; observational data. Applications: policy evaluation, medical studies, A/B testing.

Motivation: Understand causality; move beyond correlation.

Applications: Policy, medicine, econometrics.

---

## Core Concepts & Theory

### Potential Outcomes

Counterfactual outcomes; Rubin framework.

### Confounding

Unobserved variables affecting both treatment and outcome.

### Propensity Score

Probability of treatment assignment.

---

## Mathematical Formulation

Average Treatment Effect:
$$ ext{ATE} = \mathbb{E}[Y_1 - Y_0]$$

Propensity Score:
$$e(x) = P(T=1|X=x)$$

IPW Estimator:
$$ ext{ATE} = \mathbb{E}\left[\frac{TY}{e(X)} - \frac{(1-T)Y}{1-e(X)} ight]$$

---

## Advanced Theory & Extensions

### Doubly Robust

Combine regression and IPW.

### Causal Forests

ML for heterogeneous effects.

### Instrumental Variables

Handle endogeneity.

---

## Computational Considerations

Propensity matching: O(N²).

IPW: O(N).

Causal forests: O(N log N).

---

## Practical Implementation Strategies

### Overlap Assumption

Common support for propensity.

### Matching

Match similar units.

### Stratification

Group by propensity quintile.

---

## Benchmark Datasets & Evaluation

NSW Job Training: Classic causal study.

IHDP: Synthetic benchmark.

LaLonde Dataset: Policy evaluation.

---

## Key Challenges & Limitations

### Unobserved Confounders

Hidden variables affect results.

### Extrapolation

Limited overlap; poor estimation.

### Identifiability

Assumptions needed for causality.

---

## Hyperparameter Tuning

Propensity trimming: 0.01-0.1.

Bandwidth (matching): Data-dependent.

Forest parameters: Leaf size, depth.

---

## Summary & Key Takeaways

Causal Inference via propensity scores and matching enables treatment effect estimation from observational data.

Principles:
1. Potential outcomes: Rubin model.
2. Confounding: unobserved bias.
3. Propensity: overlap assumption.
4. ATE: average effect.
5. IPW: inverse weighting.

---

---

## Appendix: Practical Labs

### Lab 1: Propensity Score

import numpy as np

def estimate_propensity_score(X, T, model_type='logistic'):
 """Estimate propensity score P(T=1|X)"""
 # Simplified: logistic regression approximation
 if model_type == 'logistic':
 # Compute score (simplified)
 score = 1 / (1 + np.exp(-(X.mean(axis=1) - T.mean())))
 
 return score

# Test
np.random.seed(42)
X = np.random.randn(100, 5)
T = np.random.randint(0, 2, 100)

e = estimate_propensity_score(X, T)

assert e.shape == (100,), "Propensity shape"
print("✓ Propensity score working")

if __name__ == "__main__":
 print("Lab 1: PropensityScore - PASSED")

### Lab 2: IPW Estimator

import numpy as np

def ipw_ate(Y, T, e):
 """Inverse Probability Weighting ATE"""
 ate = np.mean(T * Y / e - (1 - T) * Y / (1 - e + 1e-8))
 return ate

# Test
np.random.seed(42)
Y = np.random.randn(100)
T = np.random.randint(0, 2, 100)
e = np.random.rand(100)

ate = ipw_ate(Y, T, e)

assert np.isfinite(ate), "ATE finite"
print("✓ IPW ATE working")

if __name__ == "__main__":
 print("Lab 2: IPWATE - PASSED")

### Lab 3: Matching

import numpy as np

def matching_estimator(Y, T, X, caliper=0.1):
 """Nearest neighbor matching"""
 treated_idx = np.where(T == 1)[0]
 control_idx = np.where(T == 0)[0]
 
 ate = 0
 for i in treated_idx:
 # Find nearest control
 distances = np.linalg.norm(X[i] - X[control_idx], axis=1)
 best_j = control_idx[np.argmin(distances)]
 
 # Add treatment effect
 ate += Y[i] - Y[best_j]
 
 return ate / len(treated_idx)

# Test
np.random.seed(42)
Y = np.random.randn(100)
T = np.random.randint(0, 2, 100)
X = np.random.randn(100, 3)

ate = matching_estimator(Y, T, X)

assert np.isfinite(ate), "ATE finite"
print("✓ Matching working")

if __name__ == "__main__":
 print("Lab 3: Matching - PASSED")

### Lab 4: Balance Check

import numpy as np

def check_covariate_balance(X, T):
 """Check balance of covariates after matching"""
 treated = X[T == 1]
 control = X[T == 0]
 
 # Standardized difference
 mean_diff = np.abs(treated.mean(axis=0) - control.mean(axis=0))
 std_pool = np.sqrt((treated.std(axis=0)**2 + control.std(axis=0)**2) / 2)
 
 std_diff = mean_diff / (std_pool + 1e-8)
 
 return std_diff

# Test
np.random.seed(42)
X = np.random.randn(100, 5)
T = np.random.randint(0, 2, 100)

balance = check_covariate_balance(X, T)

assert balance.shape == (5,), "Balance shape"
print("✓ Balance check working")

if __name__ == "__main__":
 print("Lab 4: BalanceCheck - PASSED")

Go deeper with CFSGPT

Get AI-powered deep-dives, save terms, and run advanced simulations — free account.

Create Free Account