Semi E135

SEMI E135 defines a test method for characterizing an RF generator's transient response — how quickly and cleanly its output power settles to a commanded setpoint after a step change, rather than its behavior once it has already reached steady state. E113, E114, and E115 together establish how a fab specifies, tests, and matches an RF power-delivery system once it is running at a fixed setpoint; none of them address what happens during the brief window right after a recipe step changes the commanded power — a window a plasma process depends on just as much as steady-state delivery, because a slow or oscillatory transient can let the plasma momentarily extinguish, overshoot into a damaging power spike, or drift off the process window before the control loop catches up.

Recipe commands a step change in RF power setpoint
E113/E114/E115 cover steady-state delivery once settled, not the transition itself
SEMI E135 — RF-generator transient-response test methodCharacterizes settling time, overshoot, and oscillation after a step
Standardized step-response test: measure settling time to within tolerance
Same test conditions and pass criteria across generator vendors
Quantified overshoot and ringing, not just final steady-state accuracy
A generator can be accurate at rest and still misbehave in transition
Fab can spec and compare generators by transient behavior, not just steady-state spec
Catches a failure mode steady-state-only testing misses entirely

The reason transient response needed its own dedicated test method rather than being folded into E113's general power-delivery specification is that steady-state accuracy and transient behavior are genuinely independent properties of an RF generator's control loop — a generator can hold a rock-steady setpoint once settled while still overshooting by a damaging margin or oscillating for several milliseconds every time a recipe step commands a change, and a spec sheet built entirely around steady-state numbers would never catch that. Plasma processes with frequent step changes — multi-step etch or deposition recipes, pulsed-RF schemes — spend a non-trivial fraction of their total process time in transition, not steady state, which is exactly why E135 treats the step-response window as its own measurable, standardized quantity rather than an unspecified implementation detail left to each generator vendor's control-loop design.

An E135 Step-Response Trace, Fully Annotated steady-state accuracy says nothing about the transition between setpoints 1000W 800W 600W ±2% band step command, t=0 600W (old setpoint) 1000W (new setpoint, settled) overshoot peak settling time — what E135 measures damped ringing before settling A generator rock-steady at 1000W can still overshoot or ring getting there E135 standardizes exactly how settling time, overshoot, and ringing get measured

E135 is what gives a fab a standardized way to catch a failure mode steady-state specifications were never designed to detect — by measuring settling time, overshoot, and oscillation after a commanded step change rather than only the final accuracy once a generator has settled, it closes the gap between "this generator holds setpoint correctly" and "this generator gets to setpoint correctly," two claims E113's steady-state power-delivery specification alone cannot distinguish.

Take SEMI E135 further

Ask the copilot about this term, or have our engineers assess it against your process.