system design

**System design for LLM applications** involves **architecting scalable, reliable infrastructure to serve AI capabilities to users** — addressing unique challenges like variable latency, high memory requirements, and non-deterministic outputs while applying traditional system design principles for load balancing, caching, and fault tolerance. **What Is LLM System Design?** - **Definition**: Architecture for production LLM serving at scale. - **Challenges**: High latency, GPU costs, variable load. - **Goals**: Reliability, performance, cost efficiency. - **Approach**: Adapt traditional patterns for AI constraints. **Why LLM System Design Differs** - **Resource Intensive**: Single request may use 24GB+ GPU memory. - **Variable Latency**: Responses take 100ms to 30s depending on length. - **Stateful Conversations**: Context must be maintained across requests. - **Non-Deterministic**: Same input can produce different outputs. - **Expensive Operations**: Each token costs money. **High-Level Architecture** ```svg ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ Clients (Web, Mobile, API consumers) └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ Load Balancer (nginx, AWS ALB, CloudFlare) └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ API Gateway - Rate limiting - Authentication - Request routing └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ Cache Layer RAG Service LLM Service (Redis) (Retrieval) (vLLM/TGI) └─────────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ Vector DB GPU Cluster (Pinecone) (H100s) └─────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ ``` **Key Components** **API Layer**: ```python from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException from fastapi.middleware.cors import CORSMiddleware import asyncio app = FastAPI() @app.post("/v1/chat/completions") async def chat_completion(request: ChatRequest): # Validate if len(request.messages) == 0: raise HTTPException(400, "Messages required") # Check cache cache_key = hash_request(request) if cached := await cache.get(cache_key): return cached # Route to appropriate model model_endpoint = get_model_endpoint(request.model) # Generate (with timeout) try: response = await asyncio.wait_for( generate(model_endpoint, request), timeout=60.0 ) except asyncio.TimeoutError: raise HTTPException(504, "Generation timeout") # Cache and return await cache.set(cache_key, response, ttl=3600) return response ``` **Scaling Strategies** **Horizontal Scaling**: ``` Load Pattern | Strategy ----------------------|---------------------------------- Bursty traffic | Auto-scaling GPU instances Predictable peaks | Scheduled scaling Global users | Multi-region deployment Cost optimization | Spot instances + fallback ``` **Caching Layers**: ``` Layer | Cache What | TTL -------------------|----------------------|---------- Response cache | Full responses | 1-24 hours Embedding cache | Vector embeddings | Days KV cache | Attention states | Session Prefix cache | System prompts | Hours ``` **Multi-Model Routing** ```python def route_request(request): """Route to appropriate model based on complexity.""" # Simple queries → small/fast model if is_simple_query(request): return "gpt-4o-mini" # Complex reasoning → large model if needs_complex_reasoning(request): return "gpt-4o" # Default return "gpt-4o-mini" def is_simple_query(request): prompt = request.messages[-1].content return ( len(prompt) < 100 and not any(word in prompt for word in ["explain", "analyze", "compare"]) ) ``` **Reliability Patterns** **Circuit Breaker**: ```python class CircuitBreaker: def __init__(self, failure_threshold=5, reset_timeout=60): self.failures = 0 self.state = "closed" self.last_failure = None async def call(self, func, *args): if self.state == "open": if time.time() - self.last_failure > self.reset_timeout: self.state = "half-open" else: raise CircuitOpenError() try: result = await func(*args) self.failures = 0 self.state = "closed" return result except Exception as e: self.failures += 1 self.last_failure = time.time() if self.failures >= self.failure_threshold: self.state = "open" raise ``` **Fallback Chain**: ```python async def generate_with_fallback(request): providers = ["openai", "anthropic", "local"] for provider in providers: try: return await generate(provider, request) except Exception as e: logger.warning(f"{provider} failed: {e}") continue raise AllProvidersFailedError() ``` **Monitoring & Observability** ``` Metric | What to Track --------------------|-------------------------------- Latency (P50/P95) | TTFT, total generation time Throughput | Requests/sec, tokens/sec Error rate | 4xx, 5xx, timeouts GPU utilization | Memory, compute usage Cost | Tokens per request, $/query ``` System design for LLM applications requires **balancing performance, reliability, and cost** — applying proven distributed systems patterns while adapting to the unique constraints of GPU-bound, high-latency inference workloads.

Go deeper with CFSGPT

Get AI-powered deep-dives, save terms, and run advanced simulations — free account.

Create Free Account