X-Ray Computed-Tomography System

X-ray computed tomography (XCT), electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS), and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) each extract a different, hard-to-reach kind of information — XCT builds a full internal 3D structure non-destructively, EELS reads chemical bonding state from energy lost by transmitted electrons, and EPMA maps elemental composition quantitatively with higher precision than standard EDS provides.

Analysis question beyond standard imaging or elemental mapping
Internal 3D structure, chemical bonding state, or precise quantitative composition
Specialized analysis technique
XCT
X-ray slices reconstructed into full non-destructive 3D volume
EELS
Energy lost by transmitted electrons reveals bonding/oxidation state
EPMA
Characteristic X-rays quantified precisely for elemental composition

XCT's defining advantage is seeing a package's or structure's full internal 3D geometry without physically cutting it apart first — every other technique here, and most elsewhere in this analytical toolkit, is inherently destructive or surface-limited. A package cross-section for SEM or TEM inspection only reveals the structure along one chosen plane, and cutting that cross-section destroys the sample for any further use; XCT reconstructs a full non-destructive 3D volume from many X-ray projections, letting an engineer inspect internal structure — solder joint voids, wire bond positions, internal cracks — from any angle afterward, and still have an intact sample if further non-destructive analysis is needed.

XCT, EELS, and EPMA — Three Different Hard-to-Reach Answers non-destructive 3D structure, bonding state, and precise composition XCT — non-destructive 3D void/crack located, sample stays intact EELS — bonding state energy-loss spectrum reveals oxidation state EPMA — quantitative composition characteristic X-ray intensity → precise atomic % per element more quantitatively precise than standard EDS EPMA builds on the same characteristic-X-ray physics EDS uses, with tighter quantification

EPMA's precision advantage over standard EDS comes from a slower, more deliberate measurement approach that trades speed for quantitative accuracy. EDS, used broadly as a quick elemental-ID add-on to SEM, collects a full X-ray spectrum rapidly but with comparatively coarse quantitative accuracy; EPMA uses more precisely calibrated detectors and longer counting times specifically tuned for quantitative composition measurement, delivering elemental percentages accurate enough for applications — like confirming the exact stoichiometry of a compound film — where EDS's faster but rougher numbers aren't good enough.

XCT, EELS, and EPMA each answer a question none of the fab's more routine imaging and elemental-ID tools can answer well on their own, and reaching for one of them signals that a failure-analysis or materials question has moved past standard SEM/EDS characterization into territory needing a non-destructive internal view, a bonding-state answer, or quantitative composition precision specifically.

Take X-ray computed-tomography system further

Ask the copilot about this term, or have our engineers assess it against your process.