DRAM-1968 Step 19 Distinguish This Series from the 64k Periphery Story
# Distinguish What This Series Covers From What the Later Periphery Series Covers
Three series in this project's DRAM lineage now exist; before closing this one, it is worth stating precisely, not just by implication, where this series' own boundary sits relative to the other two.
## 1. State This Series' Actual Scope
This series, across Steps 1 through 18, worked entirely on the single 1T1C cell and its immediate array-level consequences: what the cell is (Steps 1-4), what it costs physically and electrically (Steps 5-7), what it is worth compared to the alternative it displaced (Steps 8-9, 15, 17), and who actually built and sold it first, under what legal and economic terms (Steps 11, 14, 16). At no point did this series ask how an external system locates one cell among many through a pin-limited package, or how refresh is scheduled and executed across an entire array without host intervention.
## 2. State Precisely Where the Other Two Series Begin
This project's `dramscaling_1974` series begins exactly where this series' Step 18 left the capacitor-charge question open: what happens to $C_s$, and to this series' refresh-margin physics, once lithographic scaling shrinks the cell's planar area past the point this series' own numbers assumed. This project's `dram64k_1979` series begins somewhere this series never visited at all: pin-count pressure on packaging, address multiplexing, and on-chip refresh automation — the external-burden problem this series named explicitly in Step 13 and declined to resolve. Neither later series re-derives this series' cell physics; both simply inherit it as a given foundation, exactly as Step 9's classification intended.
## 3. Confirm No Accidental Overlap Exists
Checked directly against both later series' own step-by-step content: `dramscaling_1974` never revisits leakage, retention, or destructive readout as device physics — it treats $C_s$ purely as a capacitance-density target under scaling pressure. `dram64k_1979` never revisits the cell's internal operation at all — it treats the array as a black box with a pin count and a refresh obligation. This series' own boundary, drawn precisely here, holds cleanly against both.