Silicongate 1967 Step 17 Industry Adoption Curve Early 1970s

# Trace the Industry-Wide Adoption Curve: How Silicon Gate Became the Default by the Early 1970s

## 1. From One Adopter to an Industry Default

Step 16 of this extension named Intel as the fastest early adopter beyond Fairchild itself; this step covers the broader pattern that followed -- other MOS manufacturers converting their own lines to silicon-gate processes through the early 1970s, as the combined speed, density, and threshold-stability advantages this series has measured became difficult for any competing metal-gate line to match commercially. By the mid-1970s, metal-gate MOS had become the exception in new high-volume designs rather than the rule, a reversal from its status at this series' own 1967 starting point.

Share of New MOS Designs Using Silicon Gate, by Year an approximate, illustrative adoption curve, not precise market data 5 1967 30 1969 60 1971 85 1974 The curve illustrates the general adoption pattern this step describes, not exact measured market share.

## 2. Why No Single Company Could Hold Out on Metal Gate

Once competitors' silicon-gate parts offered meaningfully higher density and better threshold stability at comparable or lower cost, a company continuing to ship metal-gate parts was competing on a worse cost-performance curve with no compensating advantage -- which is the specific competitive mechanism, not merely a preference, that drove the conversion this step describes.

The Competitive Mechanism Behind the Conversion why holding out on metal gate stopped being viable METAL-GATE HOLDOUT worse density, step 15 less stable Vt, step 14 SILICON-GATE COMPETITOR better on both metrics comparable or lower cost MARKET OUTCOME holdout loses sockets conversion becomes necessary This is a cost-performance mechanism, not simply an industry fashion shift.

Take silicongate 1967 step 17 industry adoption curve early 1970s further

Ask the copilot about this term, or have our engineers assess it against your process.