14nm-Process

The 14 nm label was used by several manufacturers for distinct FinFET technology platforms. Intel and Samsung both documented fin-based processes, but their names do not establish identical dimensions or design rules. Fin pitch, contacted-gate pitch, metal pitch, and standard-cell architecture provide more direct comparison points. Product-level results add further context.

Intel disclosed its second-generation Tri-Gate technology in August 2014. The announcement connected the process to Broadwell and described its manufacturing and architectural objectives. That event provides one company-specific milestone. It should be distinguished from the timing of another supplier’s 14 nm process or a later revision within Intel’s own family.

14 nm process Conceptual comparison; not a manufacturing specification or scale drawing Intel milestone August 2014 disclosure Second-generation Tri-Gate Samsung milestone February 2015 production 14 nm FinFET mobile AP Comparison basis Actual pitches and cell layout Power / performance / area The shared 14 nm label does not make different manufacturers’ process platforms dimensionally identical.

Samsung announced 14 nm FinFET mobile-processor mass production in February 2015. The announcement identified the Exynos 7 Octa application processor context. This is a documented transition from technology development into a named product manufacturing program. Subsequent low-power and performance variants require their own specifications and dates.

Fin geometry and cell integration determine how density becomes useful. More conducting perimeter can increase drive capability, while fin-count quantization, contacts, and routing constrain cell choices. The wiring stack and SRAM design also influence total chip area. A transistor-density claim therefore needs a clear metric and a stated implementation.

The generation illustrates why node names are insufficient for cross-company rankings. Performance, power, area, yield, and IP availability represent different evaluation axes. A platform can be attractive for one product without being optimal for another. The useful historical comparison connects each 14 nm implementation to its documented process and products.

Sources and further reading. [Intel 14 nm disclosure, August 2014](https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/413/intel-discloses-newest-microarchitecture-and-14-nanometer); [Samsung 14 nm FinFET production announcement, February 2015](https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-announces-mass-production-of-industrys-first-14nm-finfet-mobile-application-processor).

Read 14 nm process as a generation of supplier-specific FinFET platforms whose characteristics require measured geometry and product context.

Take 14nm-process further

Ask the copilot about this term, or have our engineers assess it against your process.