Bicmos Logic 1980s Find the Capacitive Load Crossover Point
# BiCMOS Logic (Late 1980s): Step 10 — Find the Capacitive-Load Crossover Point Where BiCMOS Wins
## 1. BiCMOS Has Its Own Fixed Overhead
Steps 8 and 9 showed BiCMOS winning at the loads tested, but the bipolar output stage is not advantage without cost even at the circuit level: the base-drive stage, the bipolar device's own junction capacitances, and its minimum turn-on delay add a fixed overhead to every transition, present whether the external load is large or vanishingly small. Pure CMOS, by contrast, has no such fixed-overhead stage — its delay scales from zero load upward with no equivalent floor.
## 2. Plotting Delay Against Load for Both Topologies
Plotting $t_{pd}$ against $C_L$ for both topologies on the same axes produces two curves: pure CMOS starting near zero delay at near-zero load and rising with a steeper slope as $C_L$ grows (per Step 8's $R_{on}C_L$ relationship), and BiCMOS starting at a nonzero delay floor set by its own fixed overhead but rising with a much shallower slope. The two curves cross at a specific load capacitance — commonly in the range of several picofarads to a few tens of picofarads on processes of this era, depending on the exact bipolar device's base-drive overhead — below which pure CMOS is faster, and above which BiCMOS is faster. This crossover point, not an unconditional ranking, is the correct way to decide which output topology a given node should use.
## 3. Companion Diagram One: Quantitative View
## 4. Companion Diagram Two: Structural View